管道流量计量技术挑战与展望

doi:10.3981/j.issn.2097-0781.2024.02.012

前瞻科技 ›› 2024, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (2): 121-132.DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.2097-0781.2024.02.012

管道流量计量技术挑战与展望

梁法春¹^,^†(), 梁晓瑜², 郭立功³, 金曼青¹, 陈婧¹

1.中国石油大学（华东）储运与建筑工程学院，青岛 266580
2.中国计量大学能源环境与安全工程学院，浙江省流量计量技术研究重点实验室，杭州 310018
3.中国计量科学研究院，北京 102200

收稿日期:2024-01-14 修回日期:2024-03-28 出版日期:2024-06-20 发布日期:2024-06-26
通讯作者: †
作者简介:梁法春，教授，博士研究生导师。江苏省高层次创新创业人才引进计划入选者。主要从事油气安全高效集输技术、油气多相计量技术、储运大数据与人工智能方向研究。主持国家重点研发计划、国家自然科学基金等多项。获教育部高等学校科学研究优秀成果奖（科学技术）科学技术进步奖二等奖等省部级奖励8项。出版专著2部，发表论文100余篇，授权发明专利30余件。电子信箱：liangfch@upc.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(52176165);山东省自然科学基金(ZR2021ME034)

Challenges and Prospects of Pipeline Flow Measurement Technologies

LIANG Fachun¹^,^†(), LIANG Xiaoyu², GUO Ligong³, JIN Manqing¹, CHEN Jing¹

1. College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China
2. Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Flow Measurement Technology, College of Energy Environment and Safety Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
3. National Institute of Metrology, Beijing 102200, China

Received:2024-01-14 Revised:2024-03-28 Online:2024-06-20 Published:2024-06-26
Contact: †

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对管道运输流体流量进行精确计量是物流交接的前提和基础，也是衡量一个国家科技水平的重要因素。文章总结了单相管道流量计量技术分类以及能量计量发展现状，分析了气液分离计量、气液混相计量、气液分流取样计量3种多相管道流量计量方式特点及技术局限，阐述了虚拟计量的原理、特点、实现方式及局限。认为传统的单相管道流量测量技术已日趋成熟，当前面临的关键技术与挑战为：极端参数和复杂环境下流量计量技术、相变工况油气水多相管道流量计量技术、大宗原油贸易交接计量体系、复杂浆体流量计量技术和管道流量量值溯源。针对管道新业态、新场景对计量的要求，提出如下建议：加大新业态、新场景多相流量计研发力度，制定多相管道流量计量规范；建设管道流量量子溯源系统，实现流量计量仪表快速校准；加快数据和机理联合驱动模型研发，推动虚拟计量规模化应用；建设管道流量量子溯源系统，实现流量计量仪表快速校准；建立统一开放的管道数据共享中心，推进计量数据资源深度利用。

关键词: 管道, 能量计量, 多相计量, 虚拟计量, 量值溯源, 计量管理

Abstract:

Accurate flow metering in pipelines is not only the premise of logistics handover but also an important factor in measuring a country’s scientific and technological level. This article summarized the classification of single-phase flow metering technology and the progress of energy metering. The characteristics and technical limitations of three multi-phase flow metering methods:Gas-liquid separation metering, gas-liquid mixed-phase metering, and gas-liquid sampling metering were clarified. And the principle, characteristics, implementation methods and limitations of virtual metering were described. It is believed that traditional single-phase flow metering technology has reached a significant level of maturity. However, it still faces various key technologies and challenges, including flow metering technology for extreme parameters and complex environments, multi-phase flow metering technology for oil, gas, and water under phase change conditions, bulk crude oil trade and handover metering system, complex slurry flow metering technology, and pipeline flow value traceability. In response to the metering requirements for new pipeline business forms and scenarios, the following suggestions were put forward: Strengthening the research and development of multiphase flow meters for new business forms and scenarios and establishing multi-phase metering standards; constructing a pipeline flow value traceability system to rapidly calibrate flow meters; accelerating the research and development of models driven by data and mechanisms and promoting the large-scale application of virtual metering; building a unified and open pipeline data sharing center to advance the in-depth utilization of metering data resources.

Key words: pipeline, energy metering, multi-phase metering, virtual metering, flow value traceability, metering management

梁法春, 梁晓瑜, 郭立功, 金曼青, 陈婧. 管道流量计量技术挑战与展望[J]. 前瞻科技, 2024, 3(2): 121-132.

LIANG Fachun, LIANG Xiaoyu, GUO Ligong, JIN Manqing, CHEN Jing. Challenges and Prospects of Pipeline Flow Measurement Technologies[J]. Science and Technology Foresight, 2024, 3(2): 121-132.

图/表 1

参考文献 28

[1]	黄维和, 段继芹, 常宏岗, 等. 中国天然气能量计量体系建设探讨[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(8): 186-193.
	Huang W H, Duan J Q, Chang H G, et al. Construction of natural gas energy-metering system in China: A discussion[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(8): 186-193. (in Chinese)
[2]	魏文强, 李吉斌, 贾玲玲. 国内外天然气能量计量政策研究[J]. 中国计量, 2023(4): 22-25.
	Wei W Q, Li J B, Jia L L. Research on natural gas energy metering policies at home and abroad[J]. China Metrology, 2023(4): 22-25. (in Chinese)
[3]	成伟, 杨添波, 李长武, 等. 多气源格局下天然气计量体系国内外进展[J]. 计量科学与技术, 2024, 68(1): 3-9, 75.
	Cheng W, Yang T B, Li C W, et al. Advancements in the natural gas measurement system under a multi-source scenario: A domestic and international perspective[J]. Metrology Science and Technology, 2024, 68(1): 3-9, 75. (in Chinese)
[4]	Tromp R, Cerioni L M C. Multiphase flow regime characterization and liquid flow measurement using low-field magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Molecules, 2021, 26(11), doi: 10.3390/molecules26113349.
[5]	Falcone G. Key multiphase flow metering techniques[J]. Developments in Petroleum Science, 2009, 54, doi: 10.1016/S0376-7361(09)05404-1.
[6]	Kolla S S, Mohan R S, Shoham O. Numerical analysis of flow behavior in gas-liquid cylindrical cyclone (GLCC©) separators with inlet design modifications[J]. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 2021, 143(9), doi: 10.1115/1.4051423.
[7]	Khayat O, Afarideh H. Design and simulation of a multienergy gamma ray absorptiometry system for multiphase flow metering with accurate void fraction and water-liquid ratio approximation[J]. Nukleonika, 2019, 64(1): 19-29. DOI
[8]	Pan Y Z, Li C, Ma Y G, et al. Gas flow rate measurement in low-quality multiphase flows using Venturi and gamma ray[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2019, 100: 319-327.
[9]	梁法春, 陈婧, 陈俊文, 等. 插拔式变比例均匀取样器及气液两相流量计量[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(1): 167-174.
	Liang F C, Chen J, Chen J W, et al. Equal sampling at various extraction ratios with plug type sampler and its application in gas-liquid two-phase flow rate metering[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2021, 45(1): 167-174. (in Chinese)
[10]	Wang D, Liang F C, Peng Z Q, et al. Gas-liquid two-phase flow measurements by full stream batch sampling[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2012, 40: 113-125.
[11]	Liang F C, Sun Y, Yang G Y, et al. Gas-liquid two-phase flow rate measurement with a multi-nozzle sampling method[J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2015, 68: 82-88.
[12]	Liang F C, Sun S T, Gao J F, et al. Equal split of gas-liquid two-phase flow at variable extraction ratio[J]. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2018, 136: 165-176.
[13]	Nerby G, Saether G, Velle O J. A cost effective technique for production well testing[C]// Offshore Techonlogy Conference. Houston: OTC, 1995, doi: 10.4043/7750-MS.
[14]	韦宏. 基于神经网络的虚拟计量系统[J]. 中国计量, 2018(5): 73-76.
	Wei H. Neural network-based virtual metering system[J]. China Metrology, 2018(5): 73-76. (in Chinese)
[15]	Mahajan D, Tan K, Venkatesh T, et al. Hydrogen blending in gas pipeline networks—A review[J]. Energies, 2022, 15(10), doi: 10.3390/en15103582.
[16]	袁子云, 刘刚, 陈雷, 等. 融合机制与高斯混合回归算法的成品油管道顺序输送混油长度预测模型[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(2): 123-128.
	Yuan Z Y, Liu G, Chen L, et al. Predictive model of mixed oil length for sequential transportation of multi-product pipeline by combining mechanism and Gaussian mixture regression algorithm[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2023, 47(2): 123-128. (in Chinese)
[17]	王丹, 康琦, 宫敬, 等. 基于深度学习的海上气田生产系统数据驱动软测量模型[J]. 油气储运, 2022, 41(12): 1395-1403.
	Wang D, Kang Q, Gong J, et al. Data-driven soft sensing model for production system of offshore gas fields based on deep learning[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2022, 41(12): 1395-1403. (in Chinese)
[18]	宋尚飞, 洪炳沅, 史博会, 等. 基于人工神经网络的天然气井产量计算方法研究[J]. 石油科学通报, 2017, 2(3): 413-421.
	Song S F, Hong B Y, Shi B H, et al. Research into calculation of natural gas well production based on an artificial neural network[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2017, 2(3): 413-421. (in Chinese)
[19]	张对红, 杨毅. 大型复杂天然气管网离线仿真软件国产化研发及应用[J]. 油气储运, 2023, 42(9): 1064-1072, 1080.
	Zhang D H, Yang Y. Development and application of localized offline simulation software for large complex natural gas pipeline networks[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2023, 42(9): 1064-1072, 1080. (in Chinese)
[20]	Roy S, Ashaduzzaman M, Hassan M, et al. Blockchain for IoT security and management: Current prospects, challenges and future directions[C]// Proceedings of the 2018 5th International Conference on Networking, Systems and Security (NSysS). Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2018, doi: 10.1109/NSysS.2018.8631365.
[21]	段俐. 微重力流体物理专题序[J]. 力学学报, 2022, 54(2): 289-290.
	Duan L. Preface of theme articles on microgravity fluid physic[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2022, 54(2): 289-290. (in Chinese)
[22]	蒲晶, 孟祥玉, 闻千, 等. 原油贸易计量交接方式的对比差异及案例分析[J]. 化工管理, 2022(28): 8-11.
	Pu J, Meng X Y, Wen Q, et al. Comparative differences and case analysis of measurement handover methods of crude oil trade[J]. Chemical Enterprise Management, 2022(28): 8-11. (in Chinese)
[23]	张杰, 曾云. 浆体管道安全输送技术研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 化工矿物与加工, 2021, 50(12): 24-29, 36.
	Zhang J, Ceng Y. Research status and development trend of the safe slurry pipeline delivery technology[J]. Industrial Minerals & Processing, 2021, 50(12): 24-29, 36. (in Chinese)
[24]	周守为, 陈伟, 李清平, 等. 深水浅表层非成岩天然气水合物固态流化试采技术研究及进展[J]. 中国海上油气, 2017, 29(4): 1-8.
	Zhou S W, Chen W, Li Q P, et al. Research on the solid fluidization well testing and production for shallow non-diagenetic natural gas hydrate in deep water area[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2017, 29(4): 1-8. (in Chinese)
[25]	陈赓良, 张果. 对天然气能量计量技术进步的认识与建议[J]. 天然气与石油, 2022, 40(5): 54-58.
	Chen G L, Zhang G. Thoughts and suggestions on the development of natural gas energy determination technology[J]. Natural Gas and Oil, 2022, 40(5): 54-58. (in Chinese)
[26]	李世松, 赵伟, 黄松岭, 等. 国际单位制变革与电磁测量发展互促共赢[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2021, 41(增刊1): 261-274.
	Li S S, Zhao W, Huang S L, et al. Electrical measurements and revision of international system of units: A win-win outcome[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2021, 41(Suppl 1): 261-274. (in Chinese)
[27]	周登极, 邢同胜, 张麟, 等. 大数据背景下天然气管网数据挖掘与应用[J]. 油气储运, 2021, 40(3): 271-276.
	Zhou D J, Xing T S, Zhang L, et al. Data mining and its application in natural gas pipeline network under the context of big data[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2021, 40(3): 271-276. (in Chinese)
[28]	朱汪友, 侯磊. 基于人工智能技术的输气管道系统可靠性量化方法[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(5): 110-119.
	Zhu W Y, Hou L. Reliability quantification method of natural gas pipeline system based on artificial intelligence technology[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(5): 110-119. (in Chinese)

管道流量计量技术挑战与展望

Challenges and Prospects of Pipeline Flow Measurement Technologies

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 1

参考文献 28

相关文章 8

编辑推荐

Metrics

访问统计

友情链接

联系我们

官方微信公众号

[1]	史才军, 李富民, 申文凯, 元强, 胡翔. 混凝土管道泵送现状与展望[J]. 前瞻科技, 2024, 3(2): 102-109.
[2]	汪怀远, 朱嘉君, 王瑞涛, 徐宁, 王池嘉, 朱艳吉. 面向冷能高效利用的管道关键技术与挑战[J]. 前瞻科技, 2024, 3(2): 110-120.
[3]	宫敬, 宋尚飞, 魏生远, 史博会, 张引弟. 管道运输对能源供应链韧性和安全性的关键作用[J]. 前瞻科技, 2024, 3(2): 19-29.
[4]	朱祖超, 宿向辉, 夏建新, 贾浩, 吴渴欣, 胡建新. 深海矿产资源输运与装备发展现状与展望[J]. 前瞻科技, 2024, 3(2): 59-68.
[5]	陈朋超, 马云宾, 张斌, 关中原, 刘啸奔, 陈锋. 现代管道运输系统构建与发展[J]. 前瞻科技, 2024, 3(2): 8-18.
[6]	李玉星, 刘翠伟, 彭浩平, 韩辉, 朱建鲁, 宋光春, 王财林. 氢能运输方式与技术发展现状及挑战[J]. 前瞻科技, 2024, 3(2): 81-93.
[7]	石守稳, 孙兴悦, 刘争, 章利特, 金浩哲, 偶国富, 陈旭. 化工管道运输技术发展现状与展望[J]. 前瞻科技, 2024, 3(2): 94-101.
[8]	王玮, 苏怀, 孙文苑, 张劲军. 油气管道技术发展现状与展望[J]. 前瞻科技, 2023, 2(2): 161-167.